A good read...haven't made it all the way through it but thought some of you might dig it...
Daniel Lanois
Daniel Lanois
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
ambadextro |
Behind the Glass with Daniel Lanois |
Lead | |
|
A good read...haven't made it all the way through it but thought some of you might dig it...
Daniel Lanois |
|||
billy ward |
|||
|
Daniel is so dead on with his recording philosophy.
|
|||
Mainely Drummer |
This is Fantastic! | ||
|
Thanks amba, nice article, I never would have found it.
Interesting that he compares the "old school" recording studio experience to dressing up and going out on a date in the 50s, it was unique,where today it is uniform with ubiquitous Pro Tools. His concept of "stations" is intriguing, technology may be different and evolving, but "stations" stay the same. Let me define the concept for you. "Stations" are positions of sound, and they include instruments and their microphones, as well as whatever integrated technology you use to make that station be effective. A fundamental station, for example, might be a well-chosen acoustic piano, miked with a single ribbon microphone, positioned correctly. Put it in there, close the lid, put a blanket over it, and you will get a beautiful sound. I like mono recordings for piano because it gives me a very focused single point source, but I've also used a C24 [AKG stereo mic], which gives a beautiful sound as well. But if a track is going to be dense, i.e., if the piano is not an upfront main feature but is instead a little melody part panned over to one side, then I'd rather use a mono mic source. |
|||
billy ward |
|||
|
Danny understands that it is all about tthe music - the PLAYING of the music, so you don't want technology to interrupt the musicians. I agree with this
and abide by it in my space. Though, I don't have a single way of recording myself - I fashion it towards what the needs are. That said, there are only two
or three possible scenarios of set up for recording. generally.
|
|||
Mainely Drummer |
On Working With Eno | ||
|
I wonder if this concept would work with any collaboration, (even the low level one I am in developing cover songs) with a group of musicians?
Example, long ago, we were working on the war horse "Fire On The Mountain" one of the guitarists insisted I was rushing, and I followed his suggestion to slow the tempo without arguing. From that moment on, the song flowed beautifully, and it has ever since, we could have spent hours grinding on that thing. At any rate, this jewel may be the philosopher's stone of creative collaboration: So we're a good tag team, but we have a couple of rules that we operate by. One of them, which Brian explained to me very early on, is this: whatever I say, you agree with, and whatever you say, I will agree with. That's because it's better to agree on something and get the ball rolling. That's much more important than suffocating the subject matter with too many opinions; being in agreement matters more than whether one person's idea is better or not. We made that pact a long, long time ago and we stick by it. |
|||